Search datasheets, rules, lists, and players.
2,000pts
13
Units
61
Models
3/3
DP
Anti-infantry sits in the top 2%, spread across the list; resilience is in the bottom third.
«the top 2%» means above roughly 98% of sampled reference list shapes for that capability — a comparison, never win odds.
The shape, not the verdict. Area is not a score — two lists with the same area can play nothing alike. The bars beside it are the reading that counts, and each spoke is this list's percentile under baseline assumptions.
Open a row to see the units behind it.
Strength · Anti-infantry
Exceptional against line infantry — top 2% of lists
Top 2% · 6.73 per 100 pts · mostly Paladin Squad (19%)
385 ptsStrength · Anti-elite
Exceptional against elite infantry — top 5% of lists
Top 5% · 3.69 per 100 pts · mostly Paladin Squad (17%)
385 ptsStrength · Anti-horde
Exceptional against massed infantry — top 5% of lists
Top 5% · 8.67 per 100 pts · mostly Paladin Squad (18%)
385 ptsGap · Resilience
Fragile for its points
Bottom 16% · 1.80 per 100 pts · best available: Paladin Squad (19%)
385 ptsEstimates from weapon profiles alone — terrain, mission scoring, stratagems and target priority are not modelled.
Answers 4 of the four target archetypes at or above average.
10 scoring bodies, 90 OC on the table at deployment.
Deep Strike on 10 units, 0% of the points off the table turn 1.
Average T4.8, 2.3 W per model and 8 units with an invulnerable save.
88weighted percentile
What carries it
Plan around
Anti-infantry is the clearest answer here; Reach is the pressure point to plan around.
The army, detachment, enhancement and leader rules the maths read — including 4 conditional ones it did not fold into the numbers.
Army
Detachment
Enhancement
Warlord
Stratagems these units can trigger
Legal-looking opportunities for these units and phases, not automatic bonuses — board state, CP and the exact trigger still decide.
Who carries each answer
No single unit owns an offensive answer — losing any one of them leaves the list functional.
Special tools
Leader groups
9Good8Possible1Difficult
Good — The list has several independent ways to meet this condition.
Possible — The list can attempt this, but it depends on positioning or a key unit.
Difficult — This condition is hard to support with the current list shape.
Fit is about list shape, not about what you will draw. A «difficult» card is still scorable — it just needs the game to go your way.