Search datasheets, rules, lists, and players.
The idea is to have one objective-holding unit while the rest of the units try to liquidate as many enemy units as possible.
1,800pts
10
Units
24
Models
3/3
DP
This list sits close to average on every axis — no standout strength, no glaring gap.
Percentiles compare this list with sampled reference shapes, never win odds.
The shape, not the verdict. Area is not a score — two lists with the same area can play nothing alike. The bars beside it are the reading that counts, and each spoke is this list's percentile under baseline assumptions.
Open a row to see the units behind it.
This list sits close to the average on every axis — no standout strength, no glaring gap.
Answers 2 of the four target archetypes at or above average.
8 scoring bodies, 52 OC on the table at deployment.
Deep Strike on 6 units, 0% of the points off the table turn 1.
Average T6.7, 4.6 W per model and 10 units with an invulnerable save.
46weighted percentile
What carries it
Plan around
Anti-armour is the clearest answer here; Objective control is the pressure point to plan around.
The army, detachment, enhancement and leader rules the maths read — including 2 conditional ones it did not fold into the numbers.
Army
Detachment
Warlord
Stratagems these units can trigger
Legal-looking opportunities for these units and phases, not automatic bonuses — board state, CP and the exact trigger still decide.
Who carries each answer
No single unit owns an offensive answer — losing any one of them leaves the list functional.
Special tools
Leader groups
4Good13Possible1Difficult
Good — The list has several independent ways to meet this condition.
Possible — The list can attempt this, but it depends on positioning or a key unit.
Difficult — This condition is hard to support with the current list shape.
Fit is about list shape, not about what you will draw. A «difficult» card is still scorable — it just needs the game to go your way.