Strength · Anti-infantry
Exceptional against line infantry — top 10% of lists
Top 10% · 5.06 per 100 pts · mostly Terminator Assault Squad (20%)
345 ptsAnti-infantry sits in the top 10%, spread across the list; reach is in the bottom third.
«the top 10%» means above roughly 90% of sampled reference list shapes for that capability — a comparison, never win odds.
The shape, not the verdict. Area is not a score — two lists with the same area can play nothing alike. The bars beside it are the reading that counts, and each spoke is this list's percentile under baseline assumptions.
Open a row to see the units behind it.
Strength · Anti-infantry
Exceptional against line infantry — top 10% of lists
Top 10% · 5.06 per 100 pts · mostly Terminator Assault Squad (20%)
345 ptsStrength · Anti-armour
Strong against heavy armour
Above average · 2.75 per 100 pts · mostly Terminator Assault Squad (18%)
345 ptsStrength · Anti-elite
Strong against elite infantry
Above average · 2.74 per 100 pts · mostly Terminator Assault Squad (17%)
345 ptsGap · Reach
Short-ranged — has to close the distance
Below average · 0.59 per 100 pts · best available: Land Speeder (9%)
105 ptsEstimates from weapon profiles alone — terrain, mission scoring, stratagems and target priority are not modelled.
Answers 3 of the four target archetypes at or above average.
12 scoring bodies, 49 OC on the table at deployment.
Deep Strike on 9 units, 0% of the points off the table turn 1.
Average T5.5, 4.8 W per model and 5 units with an invulnerable save.
65weighted percentile
What carries it
Plan around
Anti-infantry is the clearest answer here; Reach is the pressure point to plan around.
The army, detachment, enhancement and leader rules the maths read — including 7 conditional ones it did not fold into the numbers.
Army
Detachment
Enhancement
Warlord
Stratagems these units can trigger
Legal-looking opportunities for these units and phases, not automatic bonuses — board state, CP and the exact trigger still decide.
Who carries each answer
No single unit owns an offensive answer — losing any one of them leaves the list functional.
Special tools
Leader groups
4Good7Possible7Difficult
Good — The list has several independent ways to meet this condition.
Possible — The list can attempt this, but it depends on positioning or a key unit.
Difficult — This condition is hard to support with the current list shape.
Fit is about list shape, not about what you will draw. A «difficult» card is still scorable — it just needs the game to go your way.