Search datasheets, rules, lists, and players.
1,945pts
9
Units
9
Models
3/3
DP
Anti-armour sits in the top 7%, spread across the list.
«the top 7%» means above roughly 93% of sampled reference list shapes for that capability — a comparison, never win odds.
The shape, not the verdict. Area is not a score — two lists with the same area can play nothing alike. The bars beside it are the reading that counts, and each spoke is this list's percentile under baseline assumptions.
Open a row to see the units behind it.
Strength · Anti-armour
Exceptional against heavy armour — top 7% of lists
Top 7% · 3.72 per 100 pts · mostly Knight Tyrant (25%)
390 ptsStrength · Resilience
Hard to shift
Top 10% · 2.71 per 100 pts · mostly Chaos Cerastus Knight Lancer (29%)
385 ptsStrength · Mobility
Fast across the board
Top 12% · 0.81 per 100 pts · mostly War Dog Brigand (12%)
135 ptsEstimates from weapon profiles alone — terrain, mission scoring, stratagems and target priority are not modelled.
Answers 3 of the four target archetypes at or above average.
9 scoring bodies, 66 OC on the table at deployment.
No Deep Strike, 0% of the points off the table turn 1.
Average T9.8, 18.4 W per model and 9 units with an invulnerable save.
76weighted percentile
What carries it
Plan around
Anti-armour is the clearest answer here; Objective control is the pressure point to plan around.
The army, detachment, enhancement and leader rules the maths read — including 2 conditional ones it did not fold into the numbers.
Army
Detachment
Warlord
Stratagems these units can trigger
Legal-looking opportunities for these units and phases, not automatic bonuses — board state, CP and the exact trigger still decide.
Who carries each answer
No single unit owns an offensive answer — losing any one of them leaves the list functional.
Special tools
Leader groups
16Good1Possible1Difficult
Good — The list has several independent ways to meet this condition.
Possible — The list can attempt this, but it depends on positioning or a key unit.
Difficult — This condition is hard to support with the current list shape.
Fit is about list shape, not about what you will draw. A «difficult» card is still scorable — it just needs the game to go your way.