Search datasheets, rules, lists, and players.
On va essayer quelque chose de nouveau pour ma première armée
985pts
11
Units
39
Models
3/3
DP
Anti-horde sits in the top 4%, spread across the list; reach is in the bottom 6%.
«the top 4%» means above roughly 96% of sampled reference list shapes for that capability — a comparison, never win odds.
The shape, not the verdict. Area is not a score — two lists with the same area can play nothing alike. The bars beside it are the reading that counts, and each spoke is this list's percentile under baseline assumptions.
Open a row to see the units behind it.
Strength · Anti-horde
Exceptional against massed infantry — top 4% of lists
Top 4% · 8.99 per 100 pts · mostly Tyrannofex (19%)
180 ptsStrength · Objective control
Holds objectives comfortably
Top 8% · 7.55 per 100 pts · mostly Hormagaunts (32%)
70 ptsStrength · Anti-infantry
Exceptional against line infantry — top 12% of lists
Top 12% · 4.84 per 100 pts · mostly Tyrannofex (16%)
180 ptsGap · Reach
Short-ranged — has to close the distance
Bottom 6% · 0.41 per 100 pts · best available: Harpy (24%)
185 ptsEstimates from weapon profiles alone — terrain, mission scoring, stratagems and target priority are not modelled.
Answers 3 of the four target archetypes at or above average.
10 scoring bodies, 62 OC on the table at deployment.
Deep Strike on 3 units, 0% of the points off the table turn 1.
Average T4.0, 2.6 W per model and 5 units with an invulnerable save.
66weighted percentile
What carries it
Plan around
Anti-horde is the clearest answer here; Reach is the pressure point to plan around.
The army, detachment, enhancement and leader rules the maths read — including 5 conditional ones it did not fold into the numbers.
Army
Detachment
Warlord
Stratagems these units can trigger
Legal-looking opportunities for these units and phases, not automatic bonuses — board state, CP and the exact trigger still decide.
Who carries each answer
No single unit owns an offensive answer — losing any one of them leaves the list functional.
Special tools
Leader groups
6Good7Possible5Difficult
Good — The list has several independent ways to meet this condition.
Possible — The list can attempt this, but it depends on positioning or a key unit.
Difficult — This condition is hard to support with the current list shape.
Fit is about list shape, not about what you will draw. A «difficult» card is still scorable — it just needs the game to go your way.