Search datasheets, rules, lists, and players.
3,000pts
29
Units
108
Models
Objective control sits in the top 6%, spread across the list; anti-elite and anti-infantry are in the bottom third.
«the top 6%» means above roughly 94% of sampled reference list shapes for that capability — a comparison, never win odds.
The shape, not the verdict. Area is not a score — two lists with the same area can play nothing alike. The bars beside it are the reading that counts, and each spoke is this list's percentile under baseline assumptions.
Open a row to see the units behind it.
Strength · Objective control
Holds objectives comfortably
Top 6% · 8.79 per 100 pts · mostly Necron Warriors (19%)
190 ptsGap · Anti-elite
Almost no answer to elite infantry — bottom 9% of lists
Bottom 9% · 1.62 per 100 pts · best available: C'tan Shard of the Void Dragon (12%)
345 ptsGap · Anti-infantry
Thin answer to line infantry
Below average · 3.24 per 100 pts · best available: C'tan Shard of the Void Dragon (11%)
345 ptsGap · Anti-armour
Thin answer to heavy armour
Below average · 1.66 per 100 pts · best available: C'tan Shard of the Void Dragon (16%)
345 ptsEstimates from weapon profiles alone — terrain, mission scoring, stratagems and target priority are not modelled.
Answers 1 of the four target archetypes at or above average.
18 scoring bodies, 211 OC on the table at deployment.
Deep Strike on 1 unit, 0% of the points off the table turn 1.
Average T4.7, 2.2 W per model and 10 units with an invulnerable save.
32weighted percentile
What carries it
Plan around
Anti-horde is the clearest answer here; Anti-elite is the pressure point to plan around.
The army, detachment, enhancement and leader rules the maths read — including 14 conditional ones it did not fold into the numbers.
Army
Detachment
Enhancement
Leader
Warlord
Stratagems these units can trigger
Legal-looking opportunities for these units and phases, not automatic bonuses — board state, CP and the exact trigger still decide.
Who carries each answer
No single unit owns an offensive answer — losing any one of them leaves the list functional.
Special tools
Leader groups
4Good6Possible8Difficult
Good — The list has several independent ways to meet this condition.
Possible — The list can attempt this, but it depends on positioning or a key unit.
Difficult — This condition is hard to support with the current list shape.
Fit is about list shape, not about what you will draw. A «difficult» card is still scorable — it just needs the game to go your way.